These models performed well in our tests and have strong reliability ratings
Acura RDX
By Jon Linkov
Used cars are always a good value because a prior owner has taken the depreciation hit, making their loss your gain. Even though the average cost of a used car through the fall of 2024 was $25,239, there are plenty of reliable and safe vehicles on the market for half of that amount.
To better focus your search, we dug through years of test data and hundreds of thousands of survey responses to find the best used cars between $10,000 and $15,000.
The models below (listed alphabetically by segment) are the ones we’d recommend to our friends and family. Each has standard electronic stability control, an important safety feature. Some were also available with active safety features such as forward collision warning (FCW), automatic emergency braking (AEB), blind spot warning (BSW), and/or rear cross traffic warning (RCTW) as optional or standard equipment when they were new.
These vehicles performed well in our tests when new, and consistently demonstrated multiple years of much-better-than-average reliability in our Annual Auto Surveys.
Of course, even for the used cars we recommend, there can be outliers. Maybe a former owner didn’t care much for car maintenance, or there was a problem at the factory the week the car rolled off the line. Before you buy, make sure to pay for a thorough inspection by a certified mechanic so that there are no surprises down the road.
This article is available to CR members.
See the Used Car Top Picks and Which Brands Make the Best Used Cars?
Small Cars
Ford C-Max
2017: $8,250-$10,975
The C-Max is an appealing all-around package, combining the fuel efficiency of its standard hybrid powertrain with the practicality of a five-door hatchback design. At 37 mpg overall, the C-Max isn’t as fuel-efficient as the Toyota Prius, nor is it as roomy. But it’s much quieter inside, making the C-Max feel solid and substantial. And it’s more fun to drive, with precise steering, responsive handling, and a luxurious ride. Transitions from gas to electric power are smooth and unobtrusive, and the engine isn’t really loud unless you’re pushing it hard. The C-Max’s tall stance and low entry height make it easy to get in or out, and the cabin feels airy and spacious.
Honda Fit
2019: $12,625-$16,350
2018: $10,625-$14,725
2017: $10,725-$13,37
This generation of the Fit is quicker, safer, and even more fuel-efficient than its predecessor. By and large, it carries over the Fit’s trademarks of incredible space efficiency and interior versatility. The rear seat retains the ability to flip up the bottom cushions to create a deep well. Handling is nimble, which makes the car fun for carving corners. The engine is responsive and fuel economy is respectable at 33 mpg overall. However, the continuously variable transmission has its quirks and amplifies engine noise too much. The ride is less nervous than in previous models but remains stiff. The cabin is also loud, particularly on the highway. Look for a Fit built with the optional Honda Sensing package, which includes FCW and AEB.
Mazda3
2018: $10,375-$15,650
2017: $9,925-$13,250
2016: $8,575-$12,450
Available as a four-door sedan or five-door hatchback, the Mazda3 is a joy to drive, thanks to super-sharp handling, sprightly yet efficient engines, and smooth transmissions. We got 33 mpg overall in our test of the sedan with a 155-hp, 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine paired with the six-speed automatic. We also tested a hatchback with the manual transmission and got 32 mpg overall. Mazda’s entry-level car also offers a number of features normally found on luxury cars, including a modern infotainment system; it is controlled by a console-mounted knob and can be somewhat frustrating. Ride comfort takes a back seat to sporty handling and interior noise levels are a bit high. The four-door sedan has a good-sized trunk, while the hatchback offers more flexibility; both have a somewhat cramped rear seat for the class. FCW and AEB became standard in the 2018 model year, while BSW and RCTW were optional on lower trims but standard on the Touring and Grand Touring trims.
Subaru Impreza
2018: $9,800-$14,775
The 2018 Impreza compact is a good choice because of its impressive reliability, strong fuel economy, and available safety equipment. Available in both sedan and five-door hatchback body styles, the car is powered by a 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine mated to a continuously variable transmission (CVT); a five-speed manual gearbox is also available. We got 30 mpg overall in our tests of the CVT, an impressive number considering the car’s standard AWD. This generation of the Impreza has a comfortable ride, agile handling, and a cabin that is considerably quieter than its predecessor. The infotainment screen is easy to use, and the rear seat is comfortable. Look for one with the optional EyeSight system, which includes FCW, AEB, BSW, and RCTW.
Toyota Corolla
2018: $12,825-$15,400
2017: $11,500-$13,825
2016: $10,300-$12,600
2015: $9,425-$11,475
While this generation of the Corolla grew in size, it continued to return a frugal 32 mpg overall. Its interior room rivals some midsized sedans with a roomy rear seat. Ride comfort is commendable and handling is responsive. The continuously variable transmission amplifies the engine drone when climbing hills or merging but is unobtrusive in ordinary everyday loafing around. The controls are simple and you get a touchscreen infotainment system as well as all of the latest in connectivity. Automatic climate control comes standard on LE and above trims; this convenience is unusual in this class. Try to buy a 2017 or 2018 model if you can because they came standard with FCW and AWB with pedestrian detection.
Toyota Prius
2016: $13,625
2015: $11,000-$12,675
2014: $9,525-$11,550
The redesigned-for-2016 Prius achieved an incredible 52 mpg overall in our tests thanks to its larger, more efficient engine. Styling became much more controversial; its practical effect was that the Prius sits lower than before, sacrificing some access, visibility, and rear seat space. Still, this small hatchback can provide the family-hauling space of most midsized sedans. Handling is more sure-footed and interior noise has been reduced. The interior doesn’t feel as cheap as before, although there are some unconventional controls. Look for a model built with the TSS-P package, which includes FCW and AEB.
If you go with the 2015 or 2014 model, the car gets a still-impressive 44 mpg overall. The brakes can be a bit touchy, but they’re easy to get used to. The ride is firm, and handling is a bit reluctant. Still, the hatchback configuration, upright stance, and roomy rear seat make the Prius one of the most sensible choices out there.
Toyota Prius V
2016: $13,950
2015: $12,050
2014: $10,075
The Prius V is a wagon version of the Prius that offers a very roomy rear seat and a generous cargo area. The extra weight and bigger profile take a small toll on fuel economy, but the V still got an excellent 41 mpg overall in our tests. Despite lower gearing, the electric motor and engine have to work fairly hard, especially when the car is loaded. It drives similarly to the standard Prius, but handling isn’t exactly agile. A chairlike seating position, low sills, and big windows combine to make the Prius V feel open and airy. The standard backup camera is a welcome feature.
Midsized Cars
Buick LaCrosse
2017: $8,675-$15,525
2016: $6,875-$14,250
Buick’s flagship sedan delivers what you’d expect. The LaCrosse rides comfortably and features a well-trimmed and quiet cabin with a spacious rear seat. Paired with an eight-speed automatic, the smooth 3.6-liter V6 supplies plenty of power and a decent 24 mpg overall. The LaCrosse is one of the few offerings in the large-sedan class that is available with all-wheel drive. Handling is responsive but not sporty. The ride is cushy and absorbent, but we would skip the optional 20-inch tires, which transmit too much harshness to the passengers. Cabin access and visibility are compromised by the car’s low stance. Most controls are easy to use, including the IntelliLink touchscreen infotainment system, but the unintuitive shifter proves maddening. Active safety features were optional on all but the top Essence trim.
The previous-generation 2016 model is also a good choice, as this was one of the best generations of the big sedan. It boasts a well-finished interior and comfortable seats, along with a firm and composed ride. All of this, plus responsive handling, made the LaCrosse an impressive and competitive large sedan for the first time.
Honda Accord
2016: $12,725-$16,600
2014: $9,775-$12,375
The Accord of this era is a very comfortable and efficient midsized sedan. Four-cylinder models are paired with a continuously variable transmission and returned an excellent 30 mpg in our tests, while the V6 versions use a conventional automatic and got 26 mpg overall. EX and higher trims come with a more complicated radio and LaneWatch, which shows an image of what’s on your right side when using the right-hand turn signal. We think it’s no substitute for a BSW system that covers both sides. The Sport trim sharpens the handling a bit, but compromises ride comfort. High-end models come with standard FCW. Updates for 2016 slightly improved the ride and made the Honda Sensing safety suite, which includes FCW and AEB, available on almost every trim.
Honda Accord Hybrid
2015: $10,800-$13,750
2014: $9,775-$12,375
The Accord Hybrid of this era is a very comfortable and efficient midsized sedan. In our tests, the Hybrid’s 2.0-liter engine and electric motor returned a stellar 40 mpg overall. EX and higher trims come with a more complicated radio and LaneWatch, which shows an image of what’s on your right side when using the right-hand turn signal. We think it’s no substitute for a BSW system that covers both sides. The Sport trim sharpens the handling a bit, but compromises ride comfort. High-end models come with standard FCW. Look for a model with the Honda Sensing safety suite, which includes FCW and AEB, available on almost every trim.
Mazda6
2017: $10,250-$13,750
2016: $8,825-$11,800
This edition of the Mazda6 achieves an excellent 32 mpg overall from the smooth 184-hp, 2.5-liter four-cylinder and the six-speed automatic powertrain we tested. Acceleration doesn’t suffer for fuel economy, with the Mazda6 returning slightly above average performance. The car is also agile and capable in corners, with a taut but firm ride. However, the cabin is loud, particularly on the highway; updates for 2016 helped some. The well-finished cabin has supportive seats, although the rear seats are relatively tight for this class. The infotainment system uses a console-mounted knob; figuring out how to use the system takes some time. FCW, AEB, and BSW were all optional.
Nissan Altima
2018: $9,900-$12,875
This version of the Altima was considerably less lustrous than its forebears. In a segment brimming with better cars, the Altima is a lackluster choice, ranking below virtually all of its competitors with a humdrum driving experience. The 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine got 29 mpg overall in our tests, while the 3.5-liter V6 returned 24 mpg overall. If you do buy one, we suggest going with the SV trim, which included a power driver’s seat and BSW. FCW and AEB were only available on the SL trim as part of the Technology package. Said succinctly, other than its excellent reliability, we’d skip this version of the Altima. There are many better choices within the crowded midsized sedan field.
Subaru Legacy
2018: $13,000-$17,525
The Legacy is a refined and roomy midsized sedan. The car simply does everything well. This generation features improved interior quality, a contemporary touchscreen infotainment system, and a comfortable and composed ride. Two engine choices were available, a 2.5-liter four-cylinder that returned 26 mpg overall, impressive given the standard AWD, and a smooth 3.6-liter six. Both engines are mated to a continuously variable transmission; gone is the optional manual. Handling is responsive. The spacious and quiet cabin provides plenty of room for the driver, along with a large rear seat and simple controls. The infotainment system, long a Subaru weak spot, finally was brought up to date. Large windows and thin roof pillars supply excellent outward visibility. Crash-test results are top-notch, and Subaru’s EyeSight suite of safety gear included desirable features like FCW and AEB.
Toyota Avalon
2016: $13,350-$16,200
2015: $12,150-$14,000
2014: $11,475-$13,400
2013: $10,675-$12,050
The Avalon received a full redesign in 2013. Handling was greatly improved, but the cushy ride was stiffened a bit too much, especially on versions with 18-inch wheels and tires, detracting from the car’s previously relaxed character. A 2016 update improved the ride, reinstating it to what is expected from a big luxury sedan. The smooth 3.5-liter V6 and six-speed automatic form a great powertrain that delivers strong acceleration but also a commendable 24 mpg overall. The coupe-like styling necessitated the sacrifice of some rear-seat room, though it is still quite good. Outward visibility to the rear was compromised somewhat as well. Available active safety features include FCW, BSW, and RCTW. Interior materials aren’t quite as plush as you’d expect for the price, and some controls are annoying.
Toyota Avalon Hybrid
2016: $13,350-$16,200
2015: $12,150-$14,000
2014: 11,475-$13,400
2013: $10,675-$12,050
The Avalon Hybrid is an excellent vehicle overall, and we’d choose it over the regular V6 version. It has a spacious, comfortable, and well-equipped interior. The ride of the hybrid on 17-inch wheels and tires is far better than that of the V6 version on 18-inch wheels. Handling is secure overall, but steering lacks feedback. The 200-hp, 2.5-liter four-cylinder and electric motor is teamed with a continuously variable transmission, like in the Camry and Lexus ES hybrids. In our tests, we logged an excellent 36 mpg overall. The controls have been made more complicated, with flush-mounted buttons that are easy to inadvertently activate, and the limo-like rear seat has lost some room. Models with the optional navigation system get distance-sensing cruise control.
Toyota Camry
2016: $11,800-$14,825
2015: $11,225-$13,250
2014: $9,450-$12,450
The 2014 to 2016 Camry is a wise used car choice, and not just because of its excellent reliability. Among other things, this vintage benefits from improved interior quality. It also retains Camry hallmarks of generous room and a comfortable ride. Good performance and competitive fuel economy remain as well. We got 27 mpg from the 2.5-liter four-cylinder, which was good but not a standout. The 3.5-liter V6 got 24 mpg, which was competitive at the time. A more modern touchscreen infotainment system was introduced with this generation of the car. Handling is pleasant and secure, but not sporty. A freshening for the 2015 model year introduced nicer styling details and an easier-to-use touchscreen. The revisions also made the ride steadier, enhanced noise isolation, and improved crash test results.
Toyota Camry Hybrid
2016: $11,800-$14,825
2015: $11,225-$13,250
2014: $9,450-$12,450
This generation of the Camry Hybrid received a nicer interior and slightly more responsive handling. The hybrid powertrain is the pinnacle of the lineup, delivering an impressive 38 mpg overall in our tests—four mpg better than the previous version. It also rides well, is quiet, and is very reliable. Our testers had plenty of head, leg, and foot room in the comfortable cabin. Drivers found the backlighted gauges easy to read. But the on-screen radio controls were frustrating. Preset buttons on the screen are tiny and so close together that it’s hard to hit the right one; it is a bit easier with the optional larger touchscreen. 2015 brought a simplified menu structure for the radio, streamlining some basic functions.
Sports Cars
Mazda MX-5 Miata
2016: $10,600-$13,450
The fourth-generation Miata remains true to Mazda’s original formula of a lightweight, rear-wheel-drive roadster. Although 155 hp from the 2.0-liter four doesn’t sound impressive, the Miata quickly scoots along while returning a miserly 34 mpg overall. Shifting the delightfully accurate six-speed manual shifter is a joy; we’d skip the optional automatic, though it works fine. Quick and precise steering delivers sublime back-road handling, even though some body roll is noticeable. High levels of noise, thin and unsupportive seats, and a stiff ride all grow fatiguing during highway travel. Cabin space is snug, and the optional dial-controlled infotainment system takes time to master. Flipping the convertible top open or closed is a breeze.
Small SUVs
Acura RDX
2016: $13,025-$15,525
2015: $11,250-$12,900
2014: $10,875-$12,050
2013: $9,800-$10,800
With the 2013 redesign, the RDX became a much more mainstream and refined compact crossover SUV. For the second-generation SUV, Acura replaced the turbocharged four-cylinder with a V6 engine, which improved refinement, acceleration, and fuel economy. Paired with a six-speed automatic, this combination returned a respectable 22 mpg overall in our tests. Ride comfort is improved over the previous model, but the handling lost most of its sporty feel. While the RDX was competent all around and well equipped for the money, earlier models lacked some upscale luxury features. A 2016 update added more features, as well as the availability of the AcuraWatch safety suite, which included FCW and AEB.
BMW X3
2016: $10,325-$13,250
The second-generation X3 impressed us with its sporty handling, composed ride, seamless eight-speed automatic, and nicely finished interior. Supportive seats, easy access, tasteful but understated interior ambience, and a manageable size make it a very compelling compact luxury SUV. The iDrive control system takes some getting used to but proves logical over time. The electronic gear selector is also a bit unintuitive at first. Most versions available are likely the 28i, which comes with a 240-hp, 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder that returned 23 mpg overall in our tests. The X3 35i uses a strong turbocharged six-cylinder engine. Make sure you get an X3 with the optional backup camera, because rear visibility is a challenge. And try to avoid an X3 with 19-inch wheels, which severely degrade ride comfort.
Buick Envision
2017: $11,125-$15,550
Buick’s luxury compact Envision offered two engines for 2017: a 2.5-liter four-cylinder and a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder, both mated to a six-speed automatic transmission. Front- or all-wheel drive is available with the 2.5, but the turbo engine is AWD only. We got 21 mpg in our test of the turbo, a result that is mid-pack for the time. Handling is rather clumsy, however, and wind noise is pronounced. Oddly, the ride is a mixed bag of cushiness and harshness. At first blush, the ride seems absorbent, but that’s only a thin veneer; as miles are traveled, impacts punch through and the SUV bobs and rocks. Wind noise is pronounced, making a highway cruise tiring. The interior is well finished and features a relatively roomy rear seat. Safety gear was optional and not available on every trim, so check to make sure FCW and AEB are on the Envision you are considering.
Honda CR-V
2016: $12,600-$16,325
2015: $11,400-$14,700
2013: $9,375-$13,050
The fourth-generation CR-V is roomier, slightly more powerful, and more fuel-efficient than its predecessor, but it also has better crash protection. The 2015 and 2016 models get a revised 185-hp, 2.4-liter four-cylinder that is paired with a continuously variable transmission. This combo returned 24 mpg overall, which is good but not a standout. Still, it’s 2 mpg better than the 2.4-liter that arrived in 2012. The ride is comfortable, but handling is not particularly agile. Its compact dimensions make it easy to park. The rear seat is very accommodating, and a handy strap helps fold it away with one motion. Changes for 2015 improved handling, but the ride became stiffer. Road noise was slightly reduced, but remains noticeable, a perennial CR-V complaint. This update also brought more equipment, including a standard backup camera, a power driver seat for the EX, and an available power rear gate. EX and higher trims gained an unintuitive touchscreen infotainment system and Honda’s LaneWatch, which shows what lurks on the right side of the car when signaling to the right. FCW and AEV were only available on the top-trim Touring. Added reinforcements from the 2015 update improved the CR-V’s performance in the demanding IIHS small overlap crash test.
Honda HR-V
2018: $13,275-$16,000
Based on the Fit subcompact, the HR-V has a versatile, cargo-friendly rear seat. The seatback can fold down flat to expand the cargo area, or the seat bottom can flip up to create a tall cargo space. Considerably smaller and less expensive than the CR-V, the HR-V is also louder and the ride is stiffer. Handling is responsive and secure. Power comes from a 141-hp four-cylinder driving either the front or all four wheels. But the HR-V feels underpowered, an impression created by the continuously variable transmission amplifying engine noise during acceleration. The key selling points are the SUV’s excellent 29 mpg overall, very flexible interior, and generous rear seat and cargo room. Available premium features include heated leather seats, a sunroof, and keyless entry, while a backup camera is standard. We prefer the LX trim over the EX for its simpler audio controls.
Mazda CX-5
2018: $12,900-$15,975
2017: $11,775-$14,550
2016: $10,200-$12,550
The 2017 Mazda CX-5 received substantial changes, even though it looks like the previous generation of the SUV. Mazda kept the SUV’s strengths, including its responsive and economical 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine and spry, nimble handling. But they also addressed many weaknesses, making the ride more supple and absorbent and significantly reducing cabin noise. The cabin is versatile and very nicely trimmed, especially in Touring and Grand Touring trims. Figuring out the infotainment system, which is controlled by a console-located knob, takes some time. FCW and AEB were standard. The 2016 CX-5, the final year of the previous generation, gained some sound deadening and interior updates and was the first year to use the new Mazda Connect infotainment system, providing a competitive and more entertaining small SUV alternative. Handling in that year’s model is taut and agile, with quick, well-weighted steering that makes the Mazda fun to drive. However, we found the ride to be choppy and road noise pronounced, making it a loud car. The 2.5-liter four-cylinder is responsive and returned 26 mpg overall in our tests. AEB and FCW were only on top trims for 2016.
Toyota RAV4
2015: $12,225-$14,200
2014: $11,325-$13,275
This version of the RAV4 is roomy and versatile, as well as a wise used-car choice. The SUV handles nimbly and gets 24 mpg in the AWD version. But the ride is a bit stiff and the cabin is rather loud. The 2.5-liter engine is quite energetic and the transmission shifts smoothly. Although the revised RAV4 was fractionally smaller in some dimensions, passenger space and cargo room remained abundant. All-wheel drive was optional. Happily, even with the revisions, the RAV4 retained most of the agility of its earlier generations. The controls are clear and easy to use, access is easy, and the rear seat is roomy.
Midsized SUVs
Acura MDX
2015: $13,325-$15,125
2014: $11,825-$13,725
Redesigned for 2014, the MDX lost its sporty edge and sharp steering but made big strides in comfort. Road noise was drastically reduced, making the interior quieter, and the ride became more absorbent. Fuel economy from the 3.5-liter V6 and six-speed automatic was 20 mpg overall. Inside, the seats are comfortable but Acura’s dual-screen infotainment system can be confusing to navigate. The second-row seat folds and slides forward with just the push of a button, a very clever feature, but the third row is best for kids and pre-teens. Various levels of the optional AcuraWatch safety package add FCW and AEB. The best overall value is the Technology package, which includes BSW and the luxury equipment typically found in this class.
Lexus RX
2014: $14,425-$15,875
2013: $13,175-$14,425
2012: $11,675-$12,700
2011: $9,950-$11,700
This generation of the RX has the same plush and soothing demeanor as its predecessor but saw fuel economy improvements. Handling is lackluster, however, with overly light and vague steering. Still, the SUV remains secure when pushed to its limits. Ride comfort is a strong point and the cabin is quiet. The RX 350 we tested returned 21 mpg overall, which is good considering its size and performance. Front- and all-wheel-drive versions were offered. Inside is a well-finished interior with comfortable seats and room for five. Cargo room is on the modest side, and rear visibility is not ideal. The infotainment system, while gaining in terms of connectivity and capability, uses a convoluted mouse-like controller that interfaces with a center screen for audio, phone, and navigation functions. FCW and BSW were optional.
Lexus RX Hybrid
2013: $13,600-$14,425
The RX 450h combines a 3.5-liter V6 with three electric motors and a hybrid battery to produce 295 hp and can propel itself solely on electric power at low speeds. It is available in both FWD and AWD configurations, with AWD models using a separate electric motor to power the rear wheels, eliminating the need for a driveshaft. We like the SUV’s plush interior, quiet cabin, and comfortable ride, and found acceleration on par with some V6-powered SUVs from the era. Overall fuel economy of 26 mpg is an improvement over the 21 mpg in our tested RX 350. While the RX 450h is an inviting blend of performance, fuel economy, comfort, and luxury amenities, buyers interested in it only to save money might be disappointed. FCW, AEB, and BSW were all optional.
Nissan Murano
2016: $9,800-$14,200
The third-generation Murano puts more emphasis on styling and interior finish than on top-flight driving dynamics. It’s more luxurious, larger, and further refined than previous generations. The punchy, refined 3.5-liter six-cylinder carries over, paired with a continuously variable transmission, and returns 21 mpg overall. The cabin is quiet and well-finished and has an upscale feel to it. Handling is not very sporty, with overly light steering that reduces driver confidence. The ride is steady and absorbent on the standard 18-inch tires, but less so on the Platinum trim’s 20-inchers. Safety features such as FCW, AEB, and BSW were available on the SL trim with the Technology package.
Toyota 4Runner
2010: $13,775-$16,175
The Toyota 4Runner remains one of the last full-framed, truck-based SUV holdouts on the market. That makes it especially suited to off-roading, but the on-road ride is unsettled, handling is mediocre, and the interior feels cheap. It’s a high step to climb into the cabin, but once there the ceiling feels very low and confining. Limited trim versions have a sports suspension with somewhat better control, but a stiffer ride. The 4.0-liter V6 engine is powerful but roars when accelerating. The fuel economy of 18 mpg overall is decent for this brick-shaped SUV. Controls are simple, with big buttons and knobs, but the touchscreen is relatively small. A tight third-row seat is optional. Truck-based SUVs are generally known for their towing ability, but the 4Runner’s rating isn’t appreciably higher than some better-driving, car-based competitors.
Toyota Highlander
2014: $13,475-$16,775
2013: $10,725-$13,500
2012: $10,100-$12,425
2011: $9,550-$11,450
The second-generation Highlander grew in size, looking more like the midsized car-based SUV it is rather than an overgrown station wagon. Refinement dominates throughout, with a comfortable ride that isolates occupants from bumps and a very quiet interior. Driving the Highlander doesn’t feel bulky in turns, but the artificial steering feel inhibits agility. Power from the 3.5-liter V6 is spirited; expect 18 mpg with all-wheel-drive. A four-cylinder was available, but only with front-wheel-drive. Controls are very simple, with giant knobs and buttons. Second-row seat accommodations are roomy and comfortable; the third-row seat remains cramped. Higher trim versions come with a standard backup camera and all have standard stability control. If your budget allows you, the 2014 model was when the third-generation Highlander arrived with sharper styling and more responsive handling, though the SUV isn’t engaging to drive. This generation is slightly less plush inside, has a bit more interior noise, and lacks the cushy low-speed ride isolation of the previous generation. Most Highlanders have a 3.5-liter V6 and a six-speed automatic, which combined to return 20 mpg overall.
Toyota Venza
2015: 11,225-$15,050
2014: $10,125-$13,750
While the Venza looks like a tall hatchback, it’s a reliable choice for those drivers who don’t want an SUV. On the plus side, the Venza has plenty of room for passengers inside its very quiet interior, and cabin access is easy. 2014 and 2015 models have a better-organized infotainment system than earlier Venzas. As with other Toyota products, the optional 3.5-liter V6 is refined and pulls strongly, although its 20 mpg overall in our tests is nothing great. On the road, the Venza’s big 20-inch wheels hurt the ride, and handling is nothing special. The sloping roof inhibits cargo volume and the view out of the rear window, though the standard backup camera helps with the rear view when reversing.
Consumer Reports is an independent, nonprofit organization that works side by side with consumers to create a fairer, safer, and healthier world. CR does not endorse products or services, and does not accept advertising. Copyright © 2024, Consumer Reports, Inc.